IS CAMPBELL RIGHT: QUEENSLAND THE NEW SPAIN?

No, he isn’t, but there are some similarities.

(For my international readers this is purely a local blog, but the next one is written for you).

One of Australia’s most eminent economists writing under the nom de plume, Henry Thornton, is a sceptic when it comes to official unemployment statistics. He thinks that the official unemployment statistics greatly understate the true position here in Australia. Since Queensland has the highest mainland official unemployment rate, that implies Queensland has a bigger real problem. Add the officially unemployed (you only have to work one hour a week) to the underemployed, those in family businesses that are employed but not taking home any cash, and those that have given up looking for work (statistically eliminated from the data), and you get a Spanish type real unemployment number, especially in people under 25 and over 50. You can see the effect of that in the streets if you care to walk, the For Lease signs, and the closed and emptying cafes and coffee shops.

Official unemployment data is always a lagging statistic. The end of the construction cycle in mining, tunnels and apartments is upon us, and, with the AUD at USD 1.05+, expect to see more business closures in all sectors and higher official and real unemployment numbers.

That doesn’t make Queensland Spain. Sorry Campbell.

The big difference is that, whilst Queensland is having a property bust in coastal and lifestyle regions, the effects on the banks is spread across the nation and internationally. If these property risks were purely restricted to Queensland banks, then, yes, we would have Spain. Some of those banks would need a bail out. Fortunately, the Bank of Queensland was able to raise nearly AUD 500 billion in new equity.

www.davidmillhouse.com.au

IMAGINE A NATION WITHOUT ENTREPRENEURS

In 1988 I hosted a major international conference “The Third Symposium on Technical Innovation and Entrepreneurship”. This was part of an international series held in the United States and the United Kingdom with the support of the Utah Innovation Foundation, IC2 Institute from Austin, Texas, and UniQuest.

A key guest speaker at the 1988 Symposium was Mr Wan Run Nan from the Peoples’ Republic of China. Mr Wan was one of the first Chinese IT entrepreneurs. He developed technology, employed lots of people, and made money.

He could not return to China without the risk of imprisonment! His crime: he was an entrepreneur. Run Nan now lives in the United States.

The Australian labour government of the time, and notably John Button and Barry Jones, were highly supportive of employing people in Australia. They recognised, as John Button made very clear when he opened the facilities of then ASX listed Laser Dynamics Ltd on the Gold Coast, that it is entrepreneurs who build businesses, employ people and make profits. They understood the role of venture capital.

Contrast that with what is now emanating from the highest levels of the Australian labour Government in Canberra. There, it seems, we as entrepreneurs are enemy number one. Henry Ergas’ comments in the Australian (6^th August) “ .…instead of celebrating entrepreneurs, Swan despises them…Swan wallows in the nostalgia of Bruce Springsteen’s rustbelt past”. He goes on to say: “It is difficult to imagine a worse way of preparing for the daunting challenges Australia faces as the era of sky high commodity prices draws to a close. And it is difficult to imagine a starker contrast to John Button…” (For my international readers, Mr Swan is the Deputy Prime Minister and Treasurer of Australia).

Like Wan Run Nan in the PRC, the present Australian government doesn’t like entrepreneurs and publicly embarrasses some of them internationally. No wonder that many Australians are going or intending to go to more friendly destinations, Singapore for example.

WHO WILL LEAD THE UPTURN?

I recently gave a short presentation in Brisbane where I told the audience of very senior business people that I thought the Australian media reporting of European political economy was “shrill” and “often ill-informed”. There are some exceptions to that including the article in todays’ Weekend Australian by Robert Gottliebsen, and a recent publication from my good friend Michael Knox of RBS Morgans. Michael reports that of the “5000 banks in the Euro area, there are 27 which were undercapitalised under the supervision of the European Banking Authority”. He concludes: “All that remains of the European banking crisis is that market participants learn that it is over”. That is exactly my conclusion.

Gottliebsen is not taking a bet and acknowledges that there are tough times in Europe. Not, however, as tough as the post-war years: it is these years that define European political economy today and for the foreseeable future. My bet is that Europe will get its act together.

In the meantime, the China story is over as we knew it. Australian resources producers in minerals and gas are getting towards the top of the costs curve in a world of declining real prices and huge energy developments in the United States and elsewhere.

Mark my words, the US will lead the world out of its present woes, and German led Europe will recover in much better financial shape as its primary partner. That defines our corporate strategy. The German experience with its postwar Wirtschaftswunder (miracle economy) will prevail and enable its European colleagues to become competitive in the world. Gain follows pain.

Where does that leave Australia? In short, a hollowed out economy which will need significant new multi-industry investment as resources investment declines and stops. There will be rising unemployment, more company failures, more house mortgages and small business loans underwater. Roger Montgomery (www.rogermontgomery.com) is worth reading: “Now that the tide is going out, we are about to find out who has been swimming naked”.

Add a bloated government sector which will need to wound back by the next Federal Government. There is pain ahead. So don’t provide your house as security to the bank for your business loan.

G20 HUBRIS

For my readers in other countries, you probably were bemused by the lecture recently given to the statesmen and women at the G20 by the Australian Prime Minister. For many of us here, it made us cringe. This woman is an old style British socialist from the valleys of South Wales (UK). She will only ever be a footnote to history as the first female PM in Australia, for destroying her very reputable predecessor (Kevin Rudd), and lying to the electorate.

What her admonishments at the G20 omitted was the chaos in Australian economic policy. This chaos is being masked by the booming resources sector, without which Australia would be headed down the European road right now. So called climate change policy is destroying large swathes of manufacturing with massive job losses. Banks will not finance electricity generators. What does she do? She gives large amounts of taxpayers money to companies which otherwise would have to sack their workforces so that they can pay her carbon tax she said she would not introduce. Similarly, a return to industrial relations policies which belong to another age where “workers” doffed their caps to “bosses” is scything through the SME sector.

Australia today, readers, is like an obese person who does not want to get on the scales to see how heavy they are. There is a heap of bad news out there, masked only by iron ore, coal and LNG exports to China and India. If that slows, there will be no option but to get on the scales and take the medicine.

There have been recent Australian statesmen who should proudly and properly address the G20, from both sides of politics. She isn’t one of them. Sorry.

IS THIS AUSTRALIA'S INDIAN (CHINESE) SUMMER?

One of the more sober assessments of the European situation came this week from the New Zealand Prime Minister, John Key, speaking from Berlin. Key is a smart and very experienced operator and worth listening to. He commented that Greece is such a small economy that is it not likely to cause the collapse of the euro. Nor is it likely that Greeks will vote to leave the Eurozone. This contrasts with much of the hype in the Australian media.

That hype went into overdrive this week on the release of the Australian economic data. What it misses, but has been picked up a little by Alan Kohler, also an experienced operator, is that you must look behind the aggregate GDP data. If you do, you see a much different picture. As Peter Switzer commented in the Weekend Australian, if the economy is so good, why don’t we have inflation?

By far the bulk of the reported GDP gains were in resources extraction and from a relatively small group of people. Hence the per capita productivity data reported this week. Take out resources (and i suspect some of the GDP growth should be reported as GSP growth since whilst it may be Australian companies that are reporting, there is a huge amount of imported capital equipment which you can see affecting the current account data), and you see a very different economy.

Is this Australia’s Indian Summer?

www.millhouse.co

THE VALUE OF LOW SOVEREIGN RISK

Last week, the German government was able to issue bonds (“Bunds”) with a yield of 0.07%. That is a negative real interest rate. Few countries can do this: the United States can when it issues Treasuries. What does this mean for business capital costs. Typically the cost of raising capital for companies is a function of the so-called risk free rate (government bond rate). If you an Australian business you therefore pay substantially higher debt cost than a German or United States business since Australian Commonwealth bonds are considerably higher yielding. That means there are fewer Australian businesses that can attract capital since resulting hurdle rates are higher in Australia than those other two countries.

What we now see is business credit constrained by the adoption of Basel 3 rules etc. because of that tighter prudential regulation and more costly because of higher Australian sovereign risk.